Wednesday, May 6, 2020
Comparative Issues in International Management Greenhouse Gas
Question: Discuss about the Comparative Issues in International Management for Greenhouse Gas. Answer: International management refers to all viable practices of operating an organization in an efficient manner (Mead, 2009). It, therefore, requires skills and knowledge which go beyond the ordinary business expertise such as being conversant with the business regulations regarding the country in which an organization operates (Edfelt, 2010). For instance, understanding the laws and local customs governing the organizations transactions. On the other hand, comparative issues refer to various contemporary aspects that influence an organizations business activities to management tasks (Khan, 2015). Therefore, this paper seeks to analyze, comment on and critique an article on Greenhouse gas emissions from Australias biggest polluters on the rise (Tom, 2016) Analysis of the Article Review refers to a comprehensive examination of the components or structure of a particular thing primarily as a foundation for discussion and interpretation (Alcock, 2014). It is argued in the article Greenhouse gas emissions emanating from large companies in Australia is increasing on a daily basis. For instance, amongst the top ten most major polluters, eight companies' levels of emissions have increased in the previous years. Confirmation is obtained through a report released by the federal government's Clean Energy Regulator that showed a 2 percent increase of emissions in June 2015. It has raised concern regarding the extent to which the emissions are polluting the organizations such as the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) to call for the closure of the dirtiest coal-fired power stations in the country. The argument is valid since the greenhouse gas emissions cause health problems to the locals due to their destructive nature (Liebig, 2012). It would also assist in main taining ethical business operations as required by the laws of the nation. The article suggests that AGL was the largest polluter as reported by ACF because its emissions doubled from 2013-14. It appears that the company was violating the management guidelines, especially the environmental and energy laws by proceeding to acquire more coal-fired power machines in NSW. The fact that the firm pledged to shut down all its coal plants by 2050 implies that it understands the implications of gaseous emissions on the locals and environment. However, the period quoted is long and will result in dangerous risks in the long run thus compromising the general management notion. The federal government seeks to have failed in ensuring that firms operating in the energy industry adhere to the energy regulations which discourage all forms of environmental pollution. For example, ACF president Geoff Cousins reaffirms the government commitment to meeting its climate targets even after he had disclose d that eight out of ten companies polluted more in 2015 than in the previous year. For instance, Australias overall pollution rose in 2014-05 by 1.3 per cent. In such a situation, it calls for an immediate intervention on policies to reduce the widespread of these emissions. Therefore, the implementation of a unswerving action climate strategy that recompense firms and agriculturalists to reduce greenhouse gasses and setting limits on emanations on the main polluters was necessary and practical. Other measures such as closing down coal-fired power plants in phases beginning with the top ranked polluting plants is a viable idea in the management of the whole issue of greenhouse gas emission in Australia. It would assist in alleviating its adverse effects which include global warming, ozone depletion, smog pollution, ocean acidification, changes in the growth of plants and levels of nutrition (Caper, 2010). It would require a secure collaboration. Commenting on the Article ACF president Geoff Cousin's acknowledgment that eight out of the ten ranked companies have recorded an increase in their levels of pollution shows how the entire issue of contamination is becoming rampant and a threat to the environment and humans in Australia. It further reveals the Federal government's feeble efforts in the management and control of pollution. Nevertheless, there is the need to draft policy measures to fight the menace of contamination (Jane, 2011). The comments suggesting that the government was lying to the public on reducing the prevalence of pollution are valid. It means that the government is not being honest in pursuing pollution control in the country. It implies the presence of some loopholes in handling contemporary issues facing the energy industry. There should be the formulation of a clear and inclusive framework that brings together all the key players and other stakeholders in the energy sector to promoting proper management of emerging parallel issu es. The suggestion that the energy industry in Australia is pleading for government assistance to ensure the changeover to a zero-pollution future is critical. It showed a possible communication gap and strained coexistence between the industry and the federal government in the management and control of the pollution problem. Critique of the Article It only focuses on ten companies perceived to be emitting the greenhouse gasses across the nation thus bringing in the element of biases since there are many other firms operating in the energy industry. The unmentioned companies are also emitting the harmful gasses believed to pollute the environment. The article also fails to mention and explain the effects of the gaseous pollution on the environment and human beings. References Alcock, L. (2014). How to think about analysis. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Unversity Press. Caper, J. K. (2010). Greenhouse gasses: Worldwide impacts. New York: Facts On File. Edfelt, R. B. (2010). Global comparative management: A functional approach. Los Angeles: Sage. Jane, A. L. (2011). Overview of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Control Policies in Various Countries. DIANE Publishing. Khan, M. A. (2015). Diverse contemporary issues facing business management education. Hershey: Business Science Reference. Liebig, M. A. (2012). Managing agricultural greenhouse gasses: Coordinated agricultural research through GRACEnet to address our changing climate. London: Academic Press. Mead, R. . (2009). International Management: Culture and beyond. Chichester, England: John Wiley Sons. Tom, A. (2016). Greenhouse gas emissions from Australia's biggest polluters on the rise. https://www.smh.com.au/environment/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-australias-biggest-polluters-on-t he-rise-20160229-gn6g8l.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.